Skip to content
54

hundekotbeutel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a deep review moat (51,287 avg reviews) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 81Growth 48Conversion 96Competition 44Returns 99Price range 0Avg price 28Brand share 44Review moat 0Quality gap 25

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible13.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.2M

€1.2M/yr · 954K searches

Growth

Okay+18.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay€9.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad51,286.7

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Bad€3.94–€14.84

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

22

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

18%

  • Amazon Basics45%
  • AITODOS TA18%
  • Earth Rated6%
  • Diboniur5%
  • Blanlody4%
  • OIRLVCE4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 18%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€122K20%€244K30%€366K40%€488K101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +18.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '24Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Reißfest - beste Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Stärke12%

“Robust - Reisfest - Dicht”

Gesamtgröße10%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Macht was er soll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Gute Handhabung”

Geruch6%

“Guter Geruch”

Dicke5%

“haben eine gute Material-Dicke”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Für und das beste was wir nehmen konnte, reißfest, super größe, nicht zu dünn”

Materialqualität3%

“Die Größe und das Material sind top”

What buyers complain about

Dicke33%

“Dickeres Material”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Ganz schlechte Qualität”

Geruch6%

“Man kann durchschauen und es stinkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%

“Im Alltag ziemlich nervig und unpraktisch”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Die Beutel sind relativ klein”

Dünn4%

“Die Beutel/ Tüten sind ziemlich dünn von Material”

Stärke4%

“Sehr dünn und reißen oft ein”

Materialqualität3%

“Etwas sehr dünnes Material”

Umweltfreundlichkeit3%

“Problem ausgetreten mit den Ökolosches Aspekten”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Erst hatte ich Sorge, dass es reißt, passiert aber nicht...”

Top return reasons

Dünn27%
Gesamtgröße15%
Qualität insgesamt10%
Geruch9%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%
Umweltfreundlichkeit7%
Haltbarkeit5%
Dicke4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%