Skip to content
53

grünlippmuschel hund

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but soft demand (-10.0% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 56Growth 20Conversion 91Competition 33Returns 100Price range 85Avg price 95Brand share 34Review moat 40Quality gap 33

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€23.76

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great11.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€10.83–€42.97

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€418K

€418K/yr · 160K searches

Review moat

Okay2,457.95

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-10.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 flat

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

11%

  • NATUREFLOW50%
  • Lunderland10%
  • Cadoc9%
  • Veddelholzer8%
  • mammaly7%
  • YuMOVE5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€21K10%€42K15%€63K20%€84K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -10.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '24SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt32%

“Super Produkt”

Haustierfreundlich20%

“Das Beste was meinen Hunden passieren konnte”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Geschmack insgesamt5%

“Tabletten sind schmackhaft”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Gut verträglich und einfach in der Anwendung – kleiner Lapsus beim Messlöffel”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“was aber angekündigt wurde.”

Geruch3%

“Es riecht neutral”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Die Inhaltstoffe sollen ja gut sein”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Gelenkschmerzen3%

“Wertvolle Ergänzung um Gelenkproblemen vorzubeugen”

What buyers complain about

Geruch33%

“Einziger Nachteil: es stinkt xD”

Verdauungsstörungen11%

“Durchfall, konnte es wegwerfen”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Haltbarkeit zu gering”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Da beide schon etwas schwerfälliger geworden sind”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Verpackungsdose doppelt so groß, wie der Inhalt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Leider 3x so teuer”

Gelenkschmerzen3%

“Das haben mir meine Knie übel genommen”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“Tabletten für die Tierwelt”

Allergien3%

“Hilft nicht bei Hunden mit Allergie”

Geschmack insgesamt3%

“Schmecken anscheinend scheußlich”