Skip to content
58

animonda nassfutter katze

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 61Growth 41Conversion 85Competition 74Returns 100Price range 54Avg price 52Brand share 0Review moat 66Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great9.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good41%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Good848.37

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€527K

€527K/yr · 448K searches

Price range

Good€4.66–€27.22

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good€12.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+13.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 41% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

2 flat

Sellers

40

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • animonda Vom Feinsten80%
  • animonda Carny20%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€21K8%€42K12%€63K16%€84K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +13.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Haustierfreundlich31%

“Top Katzenfutter”

Geschmack insgesamt22%

“Super Futter”

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Preis-Leistung super”

Geschmack5%

“Geschmack (sehr) gut,”

Geruch4%

“kein stinkender Geruch”

Inhaltsstoffe – insgesamt3%

“die Inhaltsstoffe sind absolut in Ordnung.”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt1%

“angenehme Konsistenz in Sauce,”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“was im Alltag echt praktisch ist”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%

“Wie gewollt”

What buyers complain about

Geruch16%

“Zu viel Fett und stinkt”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Qualität wechselt manchmal”

Geschmack insgesamt12%

“Schmeckt nicht”

Geschmack9%

“Geschmackssache”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis bleibt gleich”

Textur/Konsistenz – insgesamt6%

“eher breiig”

Verdauungsstörungen3%

“Vorsicht Durchfall”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Zuviel Werbung”

Feucht/Trocken3%

“sonst sind immer irgendwelche Reste im Napf geblieben, die dann vertrocknet sind”

Abgestanden/verfault/verwöhnt3%

“Futter scheint verdorben zu sein”

Top return reasons

Produktzustand100%