Skip to content
68

schubkarrenrad

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 64Growth 67Conversion 59Competition 56Returns 97Price range 68Avg price 85Brand share 67Review moat 73Quality gap 67

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€18.93

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good565.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€6.01–€33.72

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+46.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€590K

€590K/yr · 608K searches

Conversion

Good5.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good51%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 51% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 rising

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

32%

  • Relaxdays31%
  • Garronda14%
  • MASKO9%
  • Arebos5%
  • Frosal5%
  • TAMS3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€29K10%€59K15%€88K20%€118K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 34 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +46.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße27%

“Passt Perfekt”

Qualität insgesamt25%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Preis / Leistung super”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Ware wie bestellt”

Montage/Installation5%

“Die Installation war einfach”

Stärke5%

“Solide”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Hält bis jetzt ohne”

Effizienz3%

“Er funktioniert problemlos –”

Materialqualität2%

“Material sehr gut”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%

“Leicht zu handhaben”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße15%

“Passt nicht”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Schlechte Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“nicht wie angegeben 9cm”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Hält nicht all zu lang”

Montage/Installation5%

“Einbau 10 Minuten”

Radqualität4%

“Kein Vollgummi Rad”

Dicke3%

“Welle ist etwas zu dick,”

Hartes Gefühl3%

“Sehr hartes PU-Schaumrad”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Schade um das Geld”

Druck2%

“hält luft nicht”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße74%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Dicke3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Breite3%
Montage2%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%
Radqualität1%
Montage/Installation1%
Add-Ons/Anhänge1%