Skip to content
71

futterautomat hühner

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 40Growth 57Conversion 23Competition 88Returns 97Price range 84Avg price 95Brand share 93Review moat 80Quality gap 91

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€31.17

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Great42%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great27%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great€5.13–€77.66

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great397.93

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+31.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay€206K

€206K/yr · 360K searches

Conversion

Bad1.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (27% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

43 falling

Sellers

90

Top-5 brand share

42%

Open market

53%

  • ORANGE DEAL12%
  • Kerbl Hobbyfarming9%
  • Kerbl9%
  • Omlet6%
  • GarPet5%
  • horizont5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€4K4%€8K6%€12K8%€17K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 81 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +31.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt19%

“Super Produkt”

Einfache Reinigung12%

“Hygiene & Blitzschnelle Reinigung:”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit11%

“super Set gerade für Anfänger”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Erfüllen den Zweck”

Stärke7%

“Der Automat ist super stabil”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Ansonsten super Preis-Leistungsverhältnis”

Montage/Installation5%

“Installation sehr einfach - Verbindung grüner Behälter”

Materialqualität5%

“Das Material wirkt robust”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt”

Design insgesamt3%

“durchdachtes Design”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Achtung ⚠️ sehr schlechte Qualität”

Gesamtgröße8%

“keine Passgenauigkeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Für 40€ devinitiv überteuert”

Funktionalität insgesamt8%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Auslaufsicher7%

“fängt er an zu tropfen.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Unpraktisches, hakeliges Befüllen auf dem Kopf”

Montage/Installation5%

“+ Montage erfordert etewas Geduld (Wunsch:”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Materialqualität5%

“Schlechtes Material (Schrauben,Muttern)”

Haltbarkeit5%

“nach 2 Monaten ist das Ding komplett auseinander gefallen.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße53%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Funktionalität insgesamt7%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Auslaufsicher2%
Montage2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Montage/Installation2%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%