Skip to content
59

filament box

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($30.56 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 14Conversion 43Competition 77Returns 91Price range 87Avg price 95Brand share 55Review moat 50Quality gap 67

Avg price

Incredible€30.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€8.07–€76.61

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great38%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good€377K

€377K/yr · 363K searches

Review moat

Okay1,500.48

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay3.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-21.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (38% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

25 falling

Sellers

72

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

25%

  • YOOPAI52%
  • Vacbird6%
  • Creality5%
  • inreeme5%
  • bruwaa4%
  • KICHLY3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€15K8%€30K12%€45K16%€60K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 42 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 88 weeks — -21.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Super Qualität”

Gesamtgröße15%

“Passt perfekt”

Speicherkapazität10%

“Aufbewahren super”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Sehr einfache Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Erfüllt den Zweck”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“worth the money”

Stärke6%

“das Regal anschließend stabil und hochwertig.”

Effizienz2%

“Top, funktioniert einwandfrei”

Materialqualität2%

“aus hochwertigem Material”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Die Boxen bestehen aus robustem Kunststoff und wirken langlebig”

What buyers complain about

Auslaufsicher12%

“2 Beutel sind undicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“allerdings teuer.”

Funktionalität insgesamt9%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Leider Flop”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Benutzung etwas tricky”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Defekt nach 3 Monaten”

Stärke3%

“zu dünn”

Gesamtgröße2%

“an der Stelle zu eng für die teile”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Zweckentfremdet”

Dicke2%

“Diese sind Dünn und spröde”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße50%
Defekt Material/Teile12%
Funktionalität insgesamt7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Verriegelungsmechanismus2%
Mechanismus probleme2%
Auslaufsicher2%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%