Skip to content
54

urgesteinsmehl

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but strong incumbent ratings (4.7★) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 94Conversion 62Competition 28Returns 100Price range 49Avg price 73Brand share 34Review moat 86Quality gap 19

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+107.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Great271.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good€14.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay€8.03–€21.64

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay68%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€108K

€108K/yr · 134K searches

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 68% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

12 rising

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

12%

  • Schicker Mineral36%
  • Neudorff18%
  • GP TONER17%
  • TD STONES8%
  • RoPro6%
  • DIMIKRO3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€11K20%€22K30%€32K40%€43K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +107.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 7.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt37%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt19%

“Macht was es soll”

Pflanzenwachstum11%

“Gartenliebe”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Tolle Produkte zu fairen Preisen”

Gesamtgröße10%

“Passt”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“es hält den Stall sauber”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich2%

“Gut für den Garten”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis29%

“Artikel so günstig nicht im Baumarkt zu finden”

Dicke19%

“Etwas grober als dafür gewollt”

Druckqualität13%

“Man bekommt nur einen transparenten Beutel ohne Aufdruck”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%

“info. Ist kein Mehl eher Sand, die Bezeichnung auf der Verpackung ist irreführend und nicht richtig.”

Geruch6%

“Es dämpft zu dem die Geruchsbildung ein”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße67%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt33%