Skip to content
48

tischregal

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.7%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 11Growth 11Conversion 8Competition 86Returns 85Price range 76Avg price 86Brand share 79Review moat 25Quality gap 52

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€19.26

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great56%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Great€6.12–€43.23

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad4,263.49

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€44K

€44K/yr · 344K searches

Growth

Bad-27.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

34 falling

Sellers

55

Top-5 brand share

56%

Open market

40%

  • SONGMICS27%
  • THYGIFTREE9%
  • Vida Designs9%
  • HOOBRO6%
  • Kesper5%
  • Rayher4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€1K6%€3K9%€4K12%€5K1101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 57 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 84 weeks — -27.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation21%

“Einfache Installation auf Akustikpaneelen”

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Hochwertiges Regal”

Stärke16%

“Robust”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Günstig und super”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Passt gut”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Das Produkt entspricht dem Foto”

Design insgesamt6%

“modernes Design”

Speicherkapazität4%

“Platzsparendes Regal”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“ging schnell von der Hand, selbst ohne viel handwerkliche Erfahrung.”

Kompaktheit1%

“Kleines, einfaches Regal”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Miserabel Verarbeitet”

Gesamtgröße11%

“Kleiner als gedacht”

Montage/Installation10%

“Einzig negative war der Aufbau”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Fast 40 euro für den Müll”

Stärke5%

“Etwas unstabil”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Hält leider nicht”

Holzqualität4%

“Schweres Holz”

Montage3%

“Schrauben passen nicht”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Fehlendes Bauteil”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“Klebe Regal”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße51%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Farbe5%
Montage/Installation5%
Montage3%
Gewicht schwer2%
Kratzfestigkeit2%
Materialqualität2%
Holzqualität2%