Skip to content
66

tischgrill holzkohle

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +168.0% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 37Growth 97Conversion 15Competition 64Returns 91Price range 60Avg price 95Brand share 68Review moat 69Quality gap 82

Growth

Incredible+168.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible€35.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good724.45

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good64%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good€7.25–€149.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Okay€183K

€183K/yr · 427K searches

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

23 falling

Sellers

49

Top-5 brand share

64%

Open market

31%

  • AGM21%
  • SunJas18%
  • WixbFyn11%
  • Charmline10%
  • SCHNEIDERFREUDE5%
  • kisidus5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€9K10%€18K15%€27K20%€37K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +168.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Premium Qualität”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit13%

“Absolut praktisch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Preis- Leistung perfect”

Einfache Reinigung8%

“Easy zu reinigen”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Passt”

Montage/Installation7%

“Ich habe ihn bestellt, bekommen und gleich versucht aufzubauen”

Kompaktheit7%

“Mega cool und braucht kaum Platz”

Grillen7%

“Super grill”

Portabilität6%

“klein für Transport”

Stärke4%

“robust”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Qualitätsproblem”

Rost/Korrodieren11%

“Angeblich Edelstahl verrostet”

Gesamtgröße9%

“Einziger Nachteil die Handschuhe sind absurd winzig”

Montage/Installation7%

“Mal sehen wie er sich in der Praxis anstellt- aufgebaut scheint er doch etwas klapperig”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Kann man machen Preis zu hoch”

Stärke6%

“Allerdings wirkt das Material teilweise etwas dünn und bei stärkerer Hitze merkt man, dass es kein besonders massiver Grill ist”

Grillen4%

“Verformungen bei Grill”

Entflammbar4%

“Feuer fängt”

Lackqualität4%

“Sehr einfaches dünnes Malerial”

Dicke4%

“Das Material ist sehr dünn”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße43%
Qualität insgesamt14%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Rost/Korrodieren5%
Materialqualität4%
Grillen3%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Lackqualität2%
Montage/Installation2%
Stärke2%