Skip to content
48

teigschaber klein

Skip it

Soft demand (-28.5% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 20Growth 11Conversion 73Competition 68Returns 96Price range 69Avg price 34Brand share 60Review moat 54Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Good6.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good€3.37–€41.35

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,343.46

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay€10.11

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad€78K

€78K/yr · 114K searches

Growth

Bad-28.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

82

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

27%

  • Tupperware37%
  • Apausvcm11%
  • RÖSLE7%
  • Dr. Oetker7%
  • U-Taste6%
  • Klways4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€2K6%€5K9%€7K12%€9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -28.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt22%

“Super Qualität”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Passt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Fairer Preis”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Optimale Nutzung”

Stärke9%

“Stabil, alles aus einem Material, wertig”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Wie auf den Fotos zu sehen”

Einfache Reinigung6%

“Silikonschaber, eine der besten,Erfindungen für die Küche”

Farbe3%

“Gutes Set mit fünf verschiedenen Größen und Farben”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Alles bestens sehr zuverlässig”

Griff2%

“Liegt super in der Hand”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“Absolut überteuert”

Haltbarkeit15%

“Nach einem Jahr Nutzung löst sich der Teigschaber auf”

Geruch9%

“Übler Geruch”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Qualität nicht so doll”

Hartes Gefühl7%

“Zu weich”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Tupperware Teigschaber klein”

Dicke5%

“die Dicke stört ein wenig.”

Materialqualität5%

“Material zu hart”

Stärke5%

“Also nichts besonders strapazierendes”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität2%

“Zu instabil”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße50%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Weiches Gefühl5%
Geruch5%
Hartes Gefühl5%
Materialqualität5%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Farbe2%
Form/Stil2%