Skip to content
56

straßenbesen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 53Growth 18Conversion 61Competition 53Returns 96Price range 62Avg price 79Brand share 62Review moat 57Quality gap 57

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€16.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good68%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good€6.67–€28.39

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,235.15

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€334K

€334K/yr · 388K searches

Competition

Good53%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-13.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 53% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

104

Top-5 brand share

68%

Open market

27%

  • Gardena26%
  • Novaliv18%
  • Yocada10%
  • CLEANHOME9%
  • KOTARBAU5%
  • Eyliden5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€17K10%€33K15%€50K20%€67K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt22%

“Beste Gardena Qualität”

Stärke15%

“Robust und schön zu führen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis15%

“Robuster Besen und guter Teleskopstiel super Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Alle Erwartungen erfüllt”

Einfache Reinigung7%

“Sehr robuster Straßenbesen – reinigt große Flächen schnell und gründlich”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Super Handhabung”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Verarbeitung & Stabilität:”

Griff3%

“Stabil und liegt gut in der Hand”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Montage/Installation3%

“Leichte Montage, sehr gute Qualität”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit16%

“Nach 5 Minuten unbrauchbar”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Miserable Qualität”

Stärke7%

“Teleskop Stange zu schwach”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Schon schade das man für „Neuware“ den vollen Preis zahlt”

Hartes Gefühl6%

“Borsten zu hart”

Griff5%

“Griff löst sich ständig”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Der springt nicht und scheint förmlich am Boden zu kleben”

Produktzustand3%

“Bereits benutzt”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität3%

“Unstabil”

Form/Stil3%

“Stil hält nicht gut”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße17%
Defekt Material/Teile14%
Produktzustand9%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Montage/Installation6%
Haltbarkeit5%
Form/Stil5%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Gewicht schwer4%
Mechanismus probleme3%