Skip to content
52

stickstoffdünger

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a small market ($61K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 15Growth 76Conversion 62Competition 27Returns 100Price range 79Avg price 95Brand share 41Review moat 58Quality gap 28

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€23.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.04–€43.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Great+62.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Good5.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,199.75

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay80%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad€61K

€61K/yr · 47K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

36

Top-5 brand share

80%

Open market

12%

  • GREEN2427%
  • Terra Domi23%
  • versando13%
  • DTP-SOFT9%
  • Samen-Gernand9%
  • TURBOGRUEN7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 12%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€6K20%€12K30%€18K40%€24K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +62.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt24%

“Hält was er verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Super Produkt”

Farbe15%

“Super Turbogrün”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis12%

“Sein Geld wert”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Einfach und gut”

Haltbarkeit4%

“Mega - in kurzer Zeit saftig grüner Rasen”

Effizienz4%

“Top Dünger mit großer Wirkung”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung1%

“Die Anleitung lesen”

Dicke1%

“Guter Dünner”

Wartung und Reparatur1%

“Komplettpflege”

What buyers complain about

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis28%

“Unverschämt teuer”

Funktionalität insgesamt26%

“8 Tage und vom Rasen exakt NULL Reaktion”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Keine Werbung von mir aber”

Farbe12%

“Rasen wurde wieder alles gelb”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Schlechte Qualität”

Gesamtgröße2%

“sieht grösser aus als auf den Bildern”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt30%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis25%
Defekt Material/Teile15%
Geruch10%
Gesamtgröße5%
Materialqualität5%
Stärke5%
Auslaufsicher5%