Skip to content
58

sprossenglas

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 8Conversion 66Competition 58Returns 90Price range 74Avg price 81Brand share 64Review moat 83Quality gap 57

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great348.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great€17.21

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€4.45–€44.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good5.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€370K

€370K/yr · 363K searches

Growth

Bad-33.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

26%

  • ecooe18%
  • Green SEEDS15%
  • zengreens14%
  • DUNSOO12%
  • Hisredsun7%
  • Little Plants7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€15K8%€30K12%€44K16%€59K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -33.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt26%

“Super Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit17%

“Super leichte Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Alles so wie es sein soll”

Einfache Reinigung9%

“Stabile Ausführung, gut zu reinigen, bin zufrieden”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Super Preis-Leistung, Guter Service”

Gesamtgröße5%

“passt”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung4%

“Super Set mit toller Anleitung”

Stärke3%

“Solide”

Design insgesamt2%

“ansprechendes Design,”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert super”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße12%

“Die 500ml-Gläser sind nicht so groß”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Haltbarkeit8%

“it already started falling apart”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“was a waste of money”

Einfache Reinigung5%

“Die Schalen sind nicht so einfach zu säubern, da sie innen so komisch kantig sind”

Montage4%

“Einzig die Halterung ist ein bisschen nachgiebig”

Auslaufsicher4%

“läuft schlecht ab”

Stärke4%

“Die Deckel bestehen aus zwei fragilen Teilen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“irreführende Bilder”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße34%
Defekt Material/Teile18%
Funktionalität insgesamt8%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Montage3%
Materialqualität3%
Geruch3%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%
Mechanismus probleme2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%