Skip to content
72

spinnenspray

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 62Growth 98Conversion 82Competition 34Returns 99Price range 76Avg price 81Brand share 47Review moat 66Quality gap 86

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+235.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Great8.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€17.30

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€7.90–€38.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good865.63

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€549K

€549K/yr · 365K searches

Brand share

Okay77%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

77%

Open market

19%

  • ARDAP38%
  • Envira16%
  • Patronus12%
  • YACHTICON7%
  • PATTLER4%
  • Compo4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€55K20%€110K30%€165K40%€220K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +235.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 12.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch21%

“Duft”

Sprühen/Durchfluss12%

“Super Spray”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung11%

“Ich bin sehr zufrieden mit dem Ultrasonic Indoor Pest Repeller”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“The units are very easy to use — just plug them in”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Works better than expected”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“I think its good value”

Effizienz3%

“- starke Wirksamkeit bei DIREKTkontakt”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich2%

“Ideal für Indoor & Outdoor”

Stärke1%

“Wirksam”

What buyers complain about

Geruch25%

“Also es stinkt ganz furchtbar”

Funktionalität insgesamt21%

“unwirksam”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung8%

“Mäuse sind ausgezogen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“weniger gut im Preis”

Sprühen/Durchfluss5%

“Unwirksamer Spray”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Fallen sehr klein aus”

Haltbarkeit2%

“hält nicht Lange an”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Irreführend”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Müll”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich1%

“Nicht für Wohnräume”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt36%
Geruch18%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung9%
Gesamtgröße6%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Auslaufsicher4%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Sprühen/Durchfluss3%