Skip to content
72

spinnenabwehr

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +264.9% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 32Growth 99Conversion 70Competition 53Returns 99Price range 77Avg price 87Brand share 69Review moat 66Quality gap 92

Growth

Incredible+264.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€19.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€7.90–€40.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good64%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good847.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good53%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€151K

€151K/yr · 121K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 53% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

38

Top-5 brand share

64%

Open market

31%

  • ARDAP23%
  • Envira17%
  • Patronus10%
  • Gardigo7%
  • Inovida7%
  • Compo5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€8K10%€15K15%€23K20%€30K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +264.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 18.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch20%

“Duft”

Sprühen/Durchfluss13%

“Super Spray”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung12%

“Ich bin sehr zufrieden mit dem Ultrasonic Indoor Pest Repeller”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“The units are very easy to use — just plug them in”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Works better than expected”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“I think its good value”

Effizienz4%

“Wirksam”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich2%

“Ideal für Indoor & Outdoor”

Stärke1%

“Wirksam”

What buyers complain about

Geruch25%

“Also es stinkt ganz furchtbar”

Funktionalität insgesamt19%

“unwirksam”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung9%

“Mäuse sind ausgezogen”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“weniger gut im Preis”

Sprühen/Durchfluss5%

“Unwirksamer Spray”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Fallen sehr klein aus”

Haltbarkeit2%

“hält nicht Lange an”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt1%

“Müll”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich1%

“Nicht für Wohnräume”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt37%
Geruch18%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung8%
Gesamtgröße7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Auslaufsicher4%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Sprühen/Durchfluss3%