Skip to content
59

silberfischfalle

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 60Growth 23Conversion 92Competition 39Returns 99Price range 34Avg price 43Brand share 49Review moat 68Quality gap 98

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Great11.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good776.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€503K

€503K/yr · 400K searches

Brand share

Okay75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay€11.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Okay€3.17–€21.17

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-4.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

20%

  • Catchmaster32%
  • Gerobug15%
  • Aeroxon13%
  • Patronus10%
  • Dr. Stähler5%
  • PIC4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€50K20%€101K30%€151K40%€201K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
12K8KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit13%

“Handhabung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“hält, was es verspricht”

Effizienz8%

“Funktioniert”

Sprühen/Durchfluss8%

“Super Spray”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Super Produkt”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung7%

“Silberfischchen reduziert”

Geruch7%

“Der Geruch ist recht neutral”

Montage/Installation6%

“Aufbau und Installation verlief ohne Probleme”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%

“Kleben super”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Für mich war das Produkt jeden Cent wert”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt40%

“Wirkung fraglich”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung14%

“Insekten”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“War ein teurer Flop”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit9%

“Kleber vollkommen unbrauchbar”

Geruch3%

“um nicht zu sagen es stinkt”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Seit 2 Wochen sind die Fallen aufgestellt aber bisher sind die Fallen leer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Müll”

Kontamination1%

“Am nächsten Morgen lagen 18 tote Silberfische überall rum”

Stärke1%

“Nicht sehr wirksm”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt55%
Gesamtgröße6%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung3%
Geruch3%
Auslaufsicher2%
Feucht/Trocken1%