Skip to content
56

schlupfwespen kaufen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 13Growth 95Conversion 79Competition 25Returns 100Price range 81Avg price 92Brand share 7Review moat 44Quality gap 68

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+123.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€21.97

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.09–€46.24

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great8.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,084.33

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad70%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad€51K

€51K/yr · 29K searches

Brand share

Bad97%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 70% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 rising

Sellers

6

Top-5 brand share

97%

Open market

1%

  • anwerk80%
  • Legona7%
  • nemabest5%
  • Witexo3%
  • Meanju2%
  • Ridix1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 1%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€5K20%€10K30%€15K40%€20K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 55 weeks — +123.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KPrime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jun, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Bestimmt gutes Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt16%

“Scheint zu funktionieren”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung16%

“Mottenflug fast weg”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit11%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Effizienz10%

“Effektiv”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Fängt super”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Dauerte lang”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung3%

“Anleitung befolgt”

Stärke3%

“Stabiles Teil”

Umweltfreundlichkeit3%

“umweltfreundliche Lösung, um Lebensmittelmotten gezielt zu bekämpfen.”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt23%

“Unwirksamkeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis19%

“Schade ums Geld”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt16%

“Irreführend”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung10%

“Hat die Motteneier abgetötet”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%

“Und der Kleber, naja”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“War mit der Qualität nicht zufrieden”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Infach im Gebrauch”

Gesamtgröße3%

“ungeeignet”

Auslaufsicher2%

“Verpackung undicht”

Haltbarkeit1%

“Dauert ein paar Wochen”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt42%
Funktionalität insgesamt17%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit12%
Ethischer Handel/Fairer Handel7%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Wasserbeständigkeit3%
Auslaufsicher3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%
Gesamtgröße3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%