Skip to content
71

schlupfwespen

Launch it

A $2.1M/yr market growing +170.2% this quarter with returns at 0.0% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 95Growth 97Conversion 93Competition 27Returns 100Price range 79Avg price 86Brand share 21Review moat 40Quality gap 67

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+170.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Incredible€2.1M

€2.1M/yr · 948K searches

Conversion

Great11.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€19.39

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.09–€41.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,502.53

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

10

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

6%

  • anwerk50%
  • Legona16%
  • nemabest13%
  • Plantura7%
  • Witexo7%
  • Meanju2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 6%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€210K20%€420K30%€630K40%€839K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +170.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt19%

“Scheint zu funktionieren”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Bestimmt gutes Produkt”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung15%

“Mottenflug fast weg”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Effizienz9%

“Effektiv”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“Fängt super”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Billig”

Stärke3%

“Stabiles Teil”

Umweltfreundlichkeit3%

“umweltfreundliche Lösung, um Lebensmittelmotten gezielt zu bekämpfen.”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Dauerte lang”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt25%

“Unwirksamkeit”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Schade ums Geld”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Irreführend”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung11%

“Hat die Motteneier abgetötet”

Qualität insgesamt6%

“Flop”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%

“Und der Kleber, naja”

Gesamtgröße6%

“ungeeignet”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Infach im Gebrauch”

Defekt Material/Teile2%

“Produkt hilft nicht”

Auslaufsicher2%

“Verpackung undicht”

Top return reasons

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt39%
Funktionalität insgesamt16%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit11%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Ethischer Handel/Fairer Handel6%
Auslaufsicher3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Wasserbeständigkeit3%
Gesamtgröße3%