Skip to content
59

schlauch 50mm

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 13Growth 96Conversion 24Competition 55Returns 100Price range 69Avg price 95Brand share 51Review moat 81Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+148.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible€36.44

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great378.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€2.39–€125.17

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good52%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad1.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€53K

€53K/yr · 76K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 52% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

22

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

22%

  • POOL Total30%
  • AquaOne26%
  • Valekna11%
  • Paradies Pool GmbH4%
  • nichtganzdicht24.de4%
  • Microsafe4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€3K10%€5K15%€8K20%€11K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 35 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +148.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt62%

“Super Qualität”

Stärke18%

“sehr robust bin zufrieden.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Für Gartenbewässerung zu dem Preis akzeptabel”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Genau wie beschrieben”

Materialqualität3%

“Solide”

What buyers complain about

Defekt Material/Teile21%

“Artikel schon defekt verpackt”

Add-Ons/Anhänge14%

“Kann nicht vernünftig eingebunden werden”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Leider sind die Kupplungen sehr schlecht verarbeitet”

Materialqualität7%

“das Schlauchmaterial ist so dünn, dass es sich kaum rollen lässt.”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Für mich so leider nicht sinnvoll nutzbar”

Gesamtgröße7%

“passt der Absaugschlauch nicht korrekt auf die Adapter.”

Konnektivität – insgesamt5%

“Sorzanschluss schließen bündig und sind dicht”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße70%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt6%
Materialqualität4%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Auslaufsicher3%
Stärke2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Wasserbeständigkeit1%