Skip to content
32

sägeketten

Skip it

Soft demand (-41.3% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 15Growth 4Conversion 23Competition 32Returns 88Price range 84Avg price 83Brand share 15Review moat 22Quality gap 25

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Great€13.70–€23.50

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great€18.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad1.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad8,908.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€59K

€59K/yr · 173K searches

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-41.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

66

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

4%

  • tallox38%
  • SAVIOR32%
  • Oregon11%
  • VonLux10%
  • Stihl3%
  • FACIACC2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€6K20%€12K30%€18K40%€24K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -41.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt38%

“Super Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis28%

“Super Preis/Leistung”

Gesamtgröße17%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Halten was versprechen”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Stihl halt 👍 Super so wie es sein soll”

Schärfe3%

“Super scharf”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Unkompliziert und schnell”

Holzqualität1%

“Brennholz ist fertig”

Stärke1%

“macht n robusten Eindruck”

Präzision des Schnitts1%

“Tolle erste Schnitte”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Schlechte Qualität”

Haltbarkeit18%

“Langlebigkeit miserable”

Gesamtgröße11%

“Passt nicht für Stihl MSE 170 C”

Kompatibilität – insgesamt8%

“Passt nicht für Stihl MSE 170 C”

Rost/Korrodieren6%

“Schlecht, schnell stumpf und rosten sehr sehr schnell”

Schärfe6%

“werden schnell stumpf”

Funktionalität insgesamt5%

“Laufen nicht gut”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Geldverschwendung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Warum steht nichts auf der Packung?”

Montage/Installation3%

“keine Montage möglich.”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße82%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%
Defekt Material/Teile1%
Dicke1%
Produktzustand1%
Haltbarkeit1%
Batterieeinschluss0%