Skip to content
56

rosendünger

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (19.7% search→purchase), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 78Conversion 100Competition 20Returns 100Price range 61Avg price 37Brand share 27Review moat 70Quality gap 23

Conversion

Incredible19.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+67.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good704.87

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€5.80–€29.49

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good€276K

€276K/yr · 134K searches

Avg price

Okay€10.44

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad75%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 75% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

10 flat

Sellers

37

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

7%

  • Compo53%
  • Neudorff13%
  • Dehner8%
  • degro8%
  • Solabiol6%
  • Plantura4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€28K20%€55K30%€83K40%€110K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +67.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 43.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Pflanzenwachstum33%

“Tolle Blüten”

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Super Ware”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit14%

“Einfache Handhabe”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“In dieser Preisklasse optimal”

Umweltfreundlichkeit3%

“Weil sie auch erwiesenermaßen umweltfreundlich sind”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt”

Stärke3%

“Schöne kraftvolle Rosen”

Sicherheitsstandards3%

“Sicher verschlossen”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Hält was er verspricht”

Geruch1%

“riecht nicht unangenehm”

What buyers complain about

Geruch21%

“Es riecht nicht gut”

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Günstige Ware”

Dicke14%

“Sehr grobkörnig”

Funktionalität insgesamt14%

“Ok. Sehr schnell leer”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Vom Preis ist recht teuer, als üblicherweise”

Top return reasons

Auslaufsicher79%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Feucht/Trocken4%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Umweltfreundlichkeit3%
Gesamtgröße3%