Skip to content
58

rosenbogen holz

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 67Conversion 5Competition 75Returns 98Price range 54Avg price 76Brand share 49Review moat 95Quality gap 92

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great104.74

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€97.79

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good40%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Good+47.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Good€13.54–€169.68

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad€32K

€32K/yr · 86K searches

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 40% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 flat

Sellers

33

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

18%

  • vidaXL24%
  • GOPLUS17%
  • HOMASIS14%
  • COSTWAY12%
  • Mendler10%
  • Bonnlo7%
  • Open — no brand owns it (10 brands, 18%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€9616%€2K9%€3K12%€4K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 35 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 66 weeks — +47.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '26AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis21%

“Super Preise Leistungsverhältnis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt17%

“Macht was es soll”

Montage/Installation15%

“Easy to build”

Stärke12%

“Macht einen stabilen Eindruck”

Design insgesamt8%

“Schöner Rosenbogen”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung7%

“Clear instructions”

Qualität insgesamt5%

“Erstklassige ware”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Mal sehen wie lange er durchhält”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt20%

“Schlechte Qualität”

Montage/Installation10%

“Montageaufwand etwas ggrößer”

Holzqualität10%

“Einziges Manko : Äste in Holz”

Stärke9%

“Sehr instabil”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Für 106,00 Euro habe ich etwas besseres erwartet”

Dicke6%

“Hölzer für diese Größe zu dünn”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Beschreibung sehr notdürftig”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Gestern für eine Hochzeitsfeier einsetzen wollen - der Bogen brach nach wenigen Minuten”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung4%

“Die Anleitung ist mehr eine Stückliste und kaum zu gebrauchen”

Montage3%

“Die Halterung für das befestigen in der Erde fehlen, also extra noch zum Baumarkt”

Top return reasons

Defekt Material/Teile24%
Gesamtgröße16%
Materialqualität10%
Qualität insgesamt9%
Holzqualität9%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%
Dünn3%
Schärfe3%
Farbe3%
Gummiqualität3%