Skip to content
64

rattengift

Launch it

A $1.1M/yr market growing +34.8% this quarter with returns at 0.5% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 79Growth 59Conversion 37Competition 27Returns 98Price range 61Avg price 77Brand share 56Review moat 66Quality gap 97

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Great€1.1M

€1.1M/yr · 2.4M searches

Avg price

Great€15.75

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good845.47

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€3.39–€33.38

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+34.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay3.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

23%

  • PROTECT HOME31%
  • SCQ Soluciones con Química17%
  • Hegawleo9%
  • Mice&Co7%
  • Roshield7%
  • SWISSINNO6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€111K20%€222K30%€332K40%€443K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +34.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit19%

“Easy Handhabung”

Qualität insgesamt18%

“Super Produkt”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung13%

“Rattenfalle ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%

“alles so, wie's sein soll”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Top Preis/Leistung”

Geruch4%

“starker Duft gegen Mäuse”

Stärke3%

“Stabil und einfach zu bestücken”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Eine funktionale Lösung für alle, die eine saubere und direkte Methode zur Schädlingsbekämpfung suchen”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Gute Lösung, funktioniert”

Materialqualität2%

“Sehr gute Material”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt42%

“Unwirksam”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung16%

“Rattenplage”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Allerdings recht teuer”

Geruch6%

“es stinkt abartig”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Absolut unmöglich”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Die Falle löst zu spät aus”

Gesamtgröße4%

“wirken ziemlich klein”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Falsch deklariert”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Qualität unklar”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung1%

“Nach Anleitung ausgelegt, keine Wirkung”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt31%
Gesamtgröße29%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung5%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Geruch2%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%
Haltbarkeit2%