Skip to content
62

pumpenhäuschen

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +469.2% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 9Growth 100Conversion 6Competition 60Returns 96Price range 52Avg price 94Brand share 74Review moat 41Quality gap 96

Growth

Incredible+469.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€48.83

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good€10.39–€172.30

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,426.45

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad€37K

€37K/yr · 174K searches

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

26 falling

Sellers

70

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

35%

  • Keter23%
  • Ondis2414%
  • STEINBACH12%
  • YITAHOME7%
  • ytwkafa5%
  • Casaria4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€1K8%€3K12%€4K16%€6K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +469.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 38.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation20%

“leichte Montage, stabil”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Good quality”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Preis/Leistung ok”

Stärke8%

“robust”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Ist gud macht sein job”

Wasserbeständigkeit6%

“wetterfest”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Das beste ist das man die abschließen kann”

Speicherkapazität4%

“Stauraum”

Design insgesamt2%

“macht einen robusten Eindruck”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Müll”

Montage/Installation13%

“Teile sind schon beim zusammenbauen gebrochen”

Stärke8%

“Alles in allem ein fragiles übelriechendes Konstrukt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“schade um das Geld”

Materialqualität6%

“Schlechtes Material”

Geruch5%

“Stinkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“nicht wie abgebildet”

Defekt Material/Teile4%

“Defekt Ware und Keter telefonisch nicht zu erreichen”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passform könnte besser sein”

Wasserbeständigkeit3%

“Sie ist jetzt nicht mehr 100% wasserdicht”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße44%
Defekt Material/Teile25%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Montage/Installation5%
Farbe3%
Materialqualität2%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%
Montage1%
Add-Ons/Anhänge1%