Skip to content
72

poolunterlage

Worth a look

Shows demand growing >1,000% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 100Conversion 19Competition 74Returns 98Price range 84Avg price 95Brand share 74Review moat 59Quality gap 78

Growth

Incredible>1,000%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€29.64

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€8.27–€107.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good41%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good1,133.42

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€275K

€275K/yr · 614K searches

Conversion

Bad1.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 41% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

21 rising

Sellers

56

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

30%

  • BeMaxx17%
  • NEOLYMP12%
  • ALPIDEX11%
  • bonsport10%
  • Montafox10%
  • Bestway10%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€8K6%€16K9%€25K12%€33K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)4 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 43 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — >1,000% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 78.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt26%

“super Produkt”

Gesamtgröße9%

“Alles passt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“sind nicht so teuer”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Hält, was es verspricht”

Materialqualität5%

“Material”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Easy”

Stärke5%

“sehr robust”

Dicke4%

“Das Material ist angenehm dick, sehr robust und dämpft den Untergrund perfekt”

Weiches Gefühl3%

“Angenehm weich”

Montage/Installation3%

“Die Installation dieser ist jedoch flexibel, sodass jederzeit um weitere Platten erweitert werden kann, sollte Bedarf bestehen”

What buyers complain about

Dicke24%

“Dünnes Material”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“sehr schlecht und daher kein beurteilung ok”

Stärke7%

“Extrem dünn”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Könnte bissi billiger sein”

Geruch6%

“unangenehmer Geruch - leider absolut nicht geeignet”

Griff4%

“absolut nicht rutschfest”

Übung/Sporteignung3%

“Absolut nicht geeignet für ein Gym”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“die Puzzleteile lösen sich.”

Materialqualität3%

“Viel zu dünnes Material”

Dünn3%

“Etwas dünn”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße39%
Dünn18%
Qualität insgesamt7%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Farbe4%
Materialqualität3%
Funktionalität insgesamt3%
Dicke2%
Geruch2%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%