Skip to content
44

pilzkorb

Skip it

Soft demand (-42.8% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 17Growth 4Conversion 26Competition 34Returns 97Price range 65Avg price 95Brand share 59Review moat 90Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible€28.35

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great204.6

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€8.41–€140.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay2.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€68K

€68K/yr · 115K searches

Growth

Bad-42.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

27%

  • YeahBoom28%
  • DRACHENADER20%
  • Fishstar2411%
  • okAffareFatto di Zimbardi Costanza6%
  • Lovinbirds4%
  • Marcus Weidenhandel4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€7K20%€14K30%€20K40%€27K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -42.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 24.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Hochwertig, wird von der Familie gerne genutzt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“Handlicher kleiner Korb”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“hält was sie verspricht”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Da passt ordentlich was rein”

Griff6%

“mit kräftigen Griff”

Geschenk Zweck5%

“Es war ein Geschenk”

Haustierfreundlich5%

“Katzentauglich”

Sammlungsobjekte5%

“Schöner grosser Pilzsammelkorb”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Preis stimmt”

Korrekt Inhalt5%

“O. Tolles Stück”

What buyers complain about

Benutzerfreundlichkeit33%

“Leider unbrauchbar”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Die Qualität lässt etwas zu wünschen übrig für dad geld”

Design insgesamt17%

“Eine schlechte Verarbeitung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis11%

“Etwas teuer”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße52%
Qualität insgesamt12%
Gewicht schwer5%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
Materialqualität4%
Defekt Material/Teile3%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%
Riemen/Saitenqualität2%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%
Reinigungsmodi2%