Skip to content
59

ph messgerät boden

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (3.9★), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 2Conversion 70Competition 52Returns 96Price range 71Avg price 77Brand share 58Review moat 72Quality gap 96

Quality gap

Incredible3.9★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great€15.60

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good622.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€3.03–€45.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good€282K

€282K/yr · 281K searches

Growth

Bad-46.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

20 rising

Sellers

44

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

25%

  • YAMRON25%
  • Neudorff22%
  • Tolesum9%
  • Mcbazel8%
  • BMUT6%
  • YRHWS5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€14K10%€28K15%€42K20%€56K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 32 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -46.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit32%

“Top Tool”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Genau so sollte ein Produkt sein”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis/Leistung ok”

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit7%

“Sehr gutes Messgerät”

Pflanzenwachstum5%

“Beste Gerat fur Profi Grower”

Effizienz4%

“Auch da funktioniert es einwandfrei”

Stärke3%

“Solides Gerät”

Akkulaufzeit2%

“Batterien rein fertig”

Haltbarkeit1%

“Funktioniert zuverlässig”

What buyers complain about

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit28%

“Ungenau”

Funktionalität insgesamt15%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Miserabele Qualität”

Haltbarkeit8%

“defekt nach 9 monaten”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung5%

“Ohne Anleitung in deutscher Sprache”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Feucht/Trocken4%

“trockenes Wasser”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Teilweise ohne Funktion”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Nicht wirklich easy”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Weggeworfenes Geld”

Top return reasons

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit33%
Funktionalität insgesamt30%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Haltbarkeit3%
Gesamtgröße3%
Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung2%
Produktzustand2%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%