Skip to content
70

ph messgerät

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.2%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 63Growth 66Conversion 49Competition 66Returns 91Price range 72Avg price 83Brand share 66Review moat 62Quality gap 89

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€18.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€3.03–€45.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+46.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Good45%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good€581K

€581K/yr · 814K searches

Review moat

Good1,038.16

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 45% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

29%

  • Pious18%
  • GIDIGI18%
  • UIUZMAR15%
  • RUNBO7%
  • Apera Instruments7%
  • Keero5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€23K8%€46K12%€70K16%€93K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +46.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
40K30KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit23%

“Bedienung ist super easy”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Das Tool hat eine gute Haptik und wirkt hochwertig”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt13%

“Hält was versprochen wird”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis13%

“Preis Leistung okay”

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit5%

“Messergebnisse sind relativ genau”

Gesamt anzeigen4%

“das digitale Display sehr klar.”

Effizienz3%

“Funktioniert perfekt”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Stärke2%

“Solide”

Pflanzenwachstum2%

“ideal für Pflanzen”

What buyers complain about

Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit15%

“Ungenau”

Haltbarkeit12%

“Zu schnell defekt”

Qualität insgesamt10%

“Müll”

Funktionalität insgesamt10%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit7%

“Unbrauchbar”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Beschreibung ungenügend”

Farbe5%

“Immer alles pink”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung4%

“tut mr leid, schlechte Anleitung”

Produktzustand4%

“Gebrauchtes Produkt geliefert”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Schade ums Geld”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt31%
Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit13%
Defekt Material/Teile10%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit6%
Gesamt anzeigen5%
Produktzustand4%
Gesamtgröße4%
Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung3%
Qualität insgesamt3%