Skip to content
61

paravent outdoor

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 5Growth 85Conversion 4Competition 78Returns 97Price range 44Avg price 87Brand share 65Review moat 65Quality gap 89

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great€65.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Great+85.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good900.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay€23.38–€197.98

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad€20K

€20K/yr · 99K searches

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 falling

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

30%

  • QUICK STAR27%
  • Box and Beyond15%
  • WOLTU15%
  • Fiqops5%
  • IDMarket5%
  • UISEBRT4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€8118%€2K12%€2K16%€3K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 47 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +85.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation22%

“Einfache Montage”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Top Produkt”

Stärke14%

“Solide”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“In der Summe für den Preis ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“so wie abgebildet”

Design insgesamt5%

“Sehr stabil und schönes Design”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Passt so”

Materialqualität4%

“Das Material ist stabil”

Farbe3%

“Sehe schöne Farbe (Licht neutral).”

Gewicht schwer1%

“Schön schwer, dadurch guter Stand”

What buyers complain about

Montage/Installation20%

“Nicht zu empfehlen, Aufbau unmöglich”

Stärke14%

“Nicht besonders Standfest”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“Komplett Schrott Qualität”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität6%

“Sehr wackelig”

Geeignet für den Außenbereich5%

“Für draußen nicht geignet”

Haltbarkeit4%

“hält nicht lange durch”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Schade ums Geld”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Diameter war sehr klein”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Montage3%

“Falsche Schrauben & wackelig, sonst ok”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße33%
Defekt Material/Teile11%
Qualität insgesamt10%
Montage/Installation10%
Farbe6%
Funktionalität insgesamt4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Materialqualität3%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Montage2%