Skip to content
64

nachsaat rasen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 95Conversion 90Competition 22Returns 100Price range 86Avg price 95Brand share 9Review moat 23Quality gap 77

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+111.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible€26.34

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great10.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great€9.99–€53.94

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€467K

€467K/yr · 164K searches

Review moat

Bad7,281.67

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 falling

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

1%

  • Compo32%
  • NATUREFLOW29%
  • WOLF Garten16%
  • TURBOGRUEN14%
  • Veddelholzer5%
  • BELKO3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 1%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€47K20%€93K30%€140K40%€187K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +111.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 90.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt31%

“Super Produkt”

Pflanzenwachstum24%

“Rasen wächst”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Erfüllt was verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis Leistung Ok”

Farbe5%

“Super grün”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit5%

“Tolles Ergebnis, leicht anzuwenden”

Gesamtgröße2%

“passt alles”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Genau nach einer Woche aufgegangen”

Feucht/Trocken2%

“Feuchtigkeit optimal”

Stärke2%

“robust”

What buyers complain about

Pflanzenwachstum38%

“Wächst nicht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis18%

“Schade an die 25€”

Funktionalität insgesamt13%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Marketing top, Produkt Flop”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Hält nicht das was es verspricht”

Feucht/Trocken2%

“immer Nass\Feucht gehalten.”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Echt schade hatten viel davon gehalten”

Verschwendung natürlicher Ressourcen2%

“Totalausfall”

Farbe1%

“die Farbe lässt zu wünschen übrig trotz gutem Boden”

Heizung1%

“Aber bei der ersten Hitze verbrennt er auch sofort”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt18%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis16%
Gesamtgröße13%
Pflanzenwachstum12%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%
Qualität insgesamt11%
Auslaufsicher5%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Feucht/Trocken2%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit1%