Skip to content
68

mottenschutz für kleiderschrank

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 57Growth 68Conversion 97Competition 51Returns 99Price range 74Avg price 65Brand share 54Review moat 49Quality gap 73

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible15.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good€6.78–€38.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+48.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Good€13.83

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€431K

€431K/yr · 199K searches

Brand share

Good73%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay1,590.31

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 falling

Sellers

22

Top-5 brand share

73%

Open market

19%

  • Aeroxon25%
  • iQVita13%
  • PIC13%
  • Patronus11%
  • Brevenhof11%
  • Inovida8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€17K8%€35K12%€52K16%€69K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +48.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch39%

“Dufte”

Qualität insgesamt11%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt9%

“Produktbeschreibung passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Easy anwendbar”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis/Leistung super”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung4%

“Mottenflug fast weg”

Stärke3%

“Echt stark”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%

“Die Klebefläche wirkt gleichmäßig”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Langsnhaltend”

What buyers complain about

Geruch33%

“Schwach im Aroma”

Funktionalität insgesamt13%

“Null Wirkung”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung10%

“Mottenfalle”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Teuer und wenig wirksam”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Ungenau beschrieben”

Gesamtgröße6%

“ungeeignet”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit3%

“keine einzige bleibt an der Falle kleben.”

Qualität insgesamt2%

“Wirklich so ein Müll”

Stärke2%

“Richt Super leider nicht so stark wie gehofft”

Haltbarkeit1%

“Dieser dient nur 3 monate, und nur zur Abschreckung”

Top return reasons

Geruch38%
Funktionalität insgesamt18%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%
Gesamtgröße7%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit6%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung2%
Füllt insgesamt nach2%
Auslaufsicher2%