Skip to content
65

motten bekämpfen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 36Growth 70Conversion 81Competition 62Returns 99Price range 60Avg price 72Brand share 59Review moat 32Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great8.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good€14.62

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Good+51.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Price range

Good€5.57–€29.22

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay€175K

€175K/yr · 139K searches

Review moat

Okay3,316.11

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

20

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

22%

  • PIC28%
  • Patronus15%
  • iQVita9%
  • Aeroxon9%
  • Inovida9%
  • anwerk8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€9K10%€17K15%€26K20%€35K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +51.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Geruch32%

“Dufte”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Produktbeschreibung passt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Easy anwendbar”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis7%

“Preis/Leistung super”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung5%

“Mottenflug fast weg”

Stärke3%

“Echt stark”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit2%

“Hinten ist ein schmaler Klebestreifen, der einigermaßen gut hält”

Effizienz2%

“Wirkt zuverlässig – hat bei uns das Lebensmittelmotten-Problem gelöst”

What buyers complain about

Geruch27%

“Schwach im Aroma”

Funktionalität insgesamt21%

“Null Wirkung”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung12%

“Motten falle”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Nicht gerade billig”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%

“keine einzige bleibt an der Falle kleben.”

Gesamtgröße4%

“ungeeignet”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Wirklich so ein Müll”

Stärke3%

“Richt Super leider nicht so stark wie gehofft”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“keinerlei Hinweis/Belege über Produkteigenschaften.”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Das Zeug fällt am ersten Tag schon ab”

Top return reasons

Geruch30%
Funktionalität insgesamt22%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit7%
Gesamtgröße7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung4%
Auslaufsicher3%
Qualität insgesamt3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%
Defekt Material/Teile2%