Skip to content
60

mausefalle

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 83Growth 23Conversion 96Competition 39Returns 97Price range 31Avg price 35Brand share 57Review moat 46Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great€1.3M

€1.3M/yr · 1.0M searches

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay1,912.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Okay€10.22

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay€1.80–€20.87

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-4.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 falling

Sellers

50

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

25%

  • Todoxi19%
  • VonBueren17%
  • SWISSINNO17%
  • LUNA11%
  • Fousenuk7%
  • Roshield5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€66K10%€132K15%€198K20%€264K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSpike '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit26%

“Entsorgung ist super easy”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super Produkte”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt10%

“Erfüllen ihren Zweck”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung10%

“Mäusekiller”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis-Leistung Super”

Einfache Reinigung7%

“lassen sich gut reinigen”

Stärke5%

“Robust, leicht aufzustellen”

Montage/Installation3%

“Leicht zu installierende Falle”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Langlebig, stabil & gut zu reinigen”

Funktionalität insgesamt2%

“Produkt funktioniert”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt25%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung14%

“Mausefalle”

Haltbarkeit13%

“1 mal benutzt, sofort defekt”

Qualität insgesamt7%

“Müll”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Ehrlich gesagt die Falle auch recht klein”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Unbrauchbar”

Montage/Installation4%

“Die Fallen sind etwas schwer zu montieren”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Das Geld nicht wert”

Stärke3%

“Die Fallen sind viel zu schwach”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“Gut bis auf Reinigung”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße36%
Funktionalität insgesamt29%
Defekt Material/Teile8%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Stärke4%
Mechanismus probleme4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung2%
Materialqualität2%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit1%