Skip to content
26

lisianthus samen

Skip it

A concentrated shelf (top 5 take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 1Growth 3Conversion 29Competition 0Returns 69Price range 0Avg price 21Brand share 0Review moat 100Quality gap 100

Quality gap

Incredible3.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Incredible6

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Good2.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Okay2.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Bad€7.62

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-45.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad€3K

€3K/yr · 14K searches

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Price range

Bad€3.19–€10.17

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

6

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Hardware Tribe59%
  • Generic17%
  • QEBIDVL12%
  • Worparsen8%
  • XZJMY4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%€38030%€76145%€1K60%€2K110100 Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 5 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 66 weeks — -45.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '25Spike '26AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

Top return reasons

Materialqualität67%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis17%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt17%