Skip to content
68

lebensmittelmotten bekämpfen

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 41Growth 95Conversion 96Competition 62Returns 99Price range 74Avg price 78Brand share 36Review moat 28Quality gap 60

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible14.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Incredible+114.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€16.10

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€5.57–€41.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay€213K

€213K/yr · 94K searches

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay3,740.31

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

18

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

13%

  • PIC25%
  • anwerk22%
  • Patronus22%
  • Gerobug9%
  • Legona6%
  • Plantura4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%€11K10%€21K15%€32K20%€43K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +114.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt16%

“Erfüllen ihre Aufgabe”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit15%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung9%

“Bestes Mittel gegen Motten”

Effizienz6%

“Funktioniert”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Preis Leistung okay”

Stärke5%

“Echt stark”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit5%

“Hinten ist ein schmaler Klebestreifen, der einigermaßen gut hält”

Geruch4%

“Geruchsneutral”

Funktionalität insgesamt3%

“Klappt super”

What buyers complain about

Funktionalität insgesamt29%

“Absolut ineffizient”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis16%

“Nicht gerade billig”

Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung15%

“Motten falle”

Haftung/Klebrigkeit10%

“keine einzige bleibt an der Falle kleben.”

Geruch5%

“Geruch”

Qualität insgesamt4%

“Wirklich so ein Müll”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“keinerlei Hinweis/Belege über Produkteigenschaften.”

Stärke2%

“etwas zu schwach”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Infach im Gebrauch”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Das Zeug fällt am ersten Tag schon ab”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt32%
Haftung/Klebrigkeit12%
Geruch9%
Schädlings-/Insektenbekämpfung7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Gesamtgröße5%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%
Auslaufsicher3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt3%