Skip to content
59

lay z spa filter

Worth a look

Shows demand growing >1,000% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 30Growth 100Conversion 96Competition 26Returns 97Price range 73Avg price 90Brand share 38Review moat 31Quality gap 28

Growth

Incredible>1,000%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible13.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€20.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good€7.36–€36.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay3,393.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay€134K

€134K/yr · 48K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

68

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

14%

  • POOLPURE32%
  • Bestway29%
  • Vokowin10%
  • TOREAD6%
  • AQUALTRA5%
  • CHIKIXSON5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€13K20%€27K30%€40K40%€54K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — >1,000% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 57.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Gesamtgröße35%

“Passt”

Filterung25%

“Bisher das beste Filterprodukt für unseren Whirlpool”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis16%

“Preis-Leistung echt super”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Qualität bestens,”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Macht perfekt was es soll”

Einfache Reinigung3%

“Lässt sich auch sehr gut reinigen”

Effizienz2%

“Funktioniert”

What buyers complain about

Filterung38%

“Ungeeignet als Poolfilter”

Gesamtgröße20%

“Keine gute Passgenauigkeit”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Die Dinger sind generell Schrott”

Form/Stil10%

“Ganz anders als erwartet nimmt keine runde Form an”

Defekt Material/Teile5%

“Die Dinger sind generell Schrott”

Montage/Installation5%

“Sehr Zeitaufwendige Demontage”

Wasserbeständigkeit3%

“Das Material ist scheinbar nicht mit dem warmen Chlorwasser verträglich”

Materialqualität3%

“Das Material ist scheinbar nicht mit dem warmen Chlorwasser verträglich”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße78%
Filterung12%
Defekt Material/Teile2%
Qualität insgesamt2%
Funktionalität insgesamt1%
Produktzustand1%
Form/Stil1%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Montage/Installation1%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt0%