Skip to content
36

kochthermometer für flüssigkeiten

Skip it

Prices mostly outside the sweet spot ($3.96–$12.62) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 14Growth 10Conversion 87Competition 27Returns 96Price range 0Avg price 20Brand share 29Review moat 22Quality gap 47

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad9,578.73

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Bad€7.11

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad€57K

€57K/yr · 79K searches

Growth

Bad-29.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad€3.96–€12.62

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

8%

  • BOMATA36%
  • TempPro33%
  • DOQAUS8%
  • BMUT5%
  • Westmark5%
  • Firschoie4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%€6K20%€11K30%€17K40%€23K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 27 weeks — -29.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KJan '26Feb '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Benutzerfreundlichkeit16%

“Super Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“macht seinen Job”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis14%

“Preis Leistung ok”

Qualität insgesamt12%

“Super Produkt”

Temperaturkontrolle11%

“Super Thermometer”

Effizienz8%

“Funktioniert super”

Heizung4%

“thermomerter”

Gesamt anzeigen2%

“Ablesbares display”

Gesamtgröße2%

“Passt”

Stärke2%

“Robust und genau”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit23%

“Defekt nach 4 Monaten”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Wirkt nicht hochwertig produziert”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Unbrauchbar”

Gesamt anzeigen7%

“Display ist nach einem Jahr defekt”

Wasserbeständigkeit6%

“Nicht wasserdicht”

Akkulaufzeit5%

“Batterie leer”

Funktionalität insgesamt4%

“es funktioniert nicht”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Thermostat hat einen Defekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Preis Leistung fraglich”

Touch-/Tastensteuerung3%

“Die Bedientasten lassen sich etwas schwer betätigen”

Top return reasons

Funktionalität insgesamt25%
Heizung12%
Gesamt anzeigen10%
Gesamtgröße8%
Messung / Ablesegenauigkeit7%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Temperaturkontrolle5%
Defekt Material/Teile5%
Akkulaufzeit3%
Produktzustand2%