Skip to content
65

keter aufbewahrungsbox

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 60Growth 89Conversion 11Competition 87Returns 97Price range 18Avg price 59Brand share 52Review moat 47Quality gap 79

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+94.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good€505K

€505K/yr · 399K searches

Avg price

Good€149.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay1,815.76

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Bad€28.64–€426.56

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

24 rising

Sellers

66

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

22%

  • Keter33%
  • Koll Living18%
  • STEELSØN12%
  • tectake6%
  • Koll Living Garden5%
  • Juskys5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€15K6%€30K9%€45K12%€61K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 71 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 10 weeks — +94.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '26May '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation21%

“Zusammenbau easy”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Solide, qualitativ hochwertige Box”

Stärke12%

“Solide”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis/Leistung ok”

Speicherkapazität7%

“Geräumige Box”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Passt”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Absolut wasserdicht”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Erfüllt ihren Zweck”

Design insgesamt3%

“Das Design ist sehr schön”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Einfache Handhabung”

What buyers complain about

Montage/Installation21%

“Ungenügende Aufbauanleitung”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Ware ungenügend”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Schade um das viele Geld”

Stärke4%

“Alles in allem ein fragiles übelriechendes Konstrukt”

Wasserbeständigkeit3%

“Nicht wasserfest”

Materialqualität3%

“Material nicht wie erwartet”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Riesig”

Haltbarkeit3%

“fällt fast auseinander”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung3%

“Bauanleitung. Unverständlich”

Geruch3%

“Stinkt übelst”

Top return reasons

Defekt Material/Teile36%
Gesamtgröße24%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Montage/Installation4%
Materialqualität3%
Kratzfestigkeit3%
Wasserbeständigkeit3%
Farbe2%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt1%
Stärke1%