Skip to content
56

kartoffelsack

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 10Growth 36Conversion 34Competition 81Returns 97Price range 70Avg price 77Brand share 86Review moat 74Quality gap 45

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great49%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€15.64

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good545.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good€5.92–€35.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+8.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Okay2.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€41K

€41K/yr · 96K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

37 falling

Sellers

52

Top-5 brand share

49%

Open market

46%

  • Airminti17%
  • Samenshop 2411%
  • Paerduo9%
  • Windhager7%
  • SPVN5%
  • DeeGoods5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€1K6%€2K9%€4K12%€5K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)2 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 57 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +8.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt30%

“Super Qualität”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt12%

“Absolut wie erwartet”

Gesamtgröße12%

“Passt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis/Leistung gut”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Leichte Handhabung, warten auf die Ernte”

Haltbarkeit6%

“Wiederverwendbar, robust und schön groß”

Stärke5%

“Super robust”

Pflanzenwachstum5%

“Kartoffeln wachsen prima”

Materialqualität2%

“günstige alternative zu plastik blumentöpfen”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich2%

“Für den Garten ideal”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit20%

“Sollte aber halt auch nicht die Dauerlösung sein”

Materialqualität16%

“Material könnte besser sein”

Gesamtgröße15%

“Das Gewebe ist recht locker”

Geruch10%

“Geruch streng”

Funktionalität insgesamt9%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Fehlkauf, da Wasser abläuft”

Dicke5%

“hätte ein dickeres Material erwartet.”

Qualität insgesamt3%

“Qualität mittelmäßig”

Stärke2%

“Nicht sehr standfest”

Nähen/Finish/Polieren2%

“diverse Nähte sind gerissen”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße56%
Materialqualität7%
Dünn7%
Geruch5%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Farbe4%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren2%
Haltbarkeit1%