Skip to content
51

kartoffelpflanzsäcke

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a small market ($13K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 3Growth 50Conversion 10Competition 83Returns 100Price range 60Avg price 81Brand share 66Review moat 73Quality gap 28

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great€17.22

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good596.89

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good€4.28–€31.21

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+19.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad0.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€13K

€13K/yr · 94K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

41

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

30%

  • Airminti29%
  • Paerduo18%
  • LITLANDSTAR9%
  • kopotma5%
  • TTL GARDEN5%
  • Lafisun5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%€3796%€7599%€1K12%€2K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 46 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +19.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 55.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Robuste Säcke, gute Qualität”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit12%

“Leichte Handhabung, warten auf die Ernte”

Gesamtgröße11%

“Passt”

Stärke10%

“Super robust”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis/Leistung gut”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“Erwartungen erfüllt”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Wiederverwendbar, robust und schön groß”

Pflanzenwachstum4%

“Kartoffeln wachsen prima”

Materialqualität3%

“trotzdem gutes Material”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“Sie sind etwas Wasserdurchlässig”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit44%

“Sollte aber halt auch nicht die Dauerlösung sein”

Wasserbeständigkeit22%

“Fehlkauf, da Wasser abläuft”

Materialqualität11%

“War der Meinung es ist ein anderes Material”

Gesamtgröße11%

“der Sack ist sehr klein”

Stärke6%

“Nicht sehr standfest”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße68%
Materialqualität7%
Farbe5%
Nähen/Finish/Polieren4%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Dünn4%
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Haltbarkeit1%
Geruch1%