Skip to content
66

gießkanne

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.9%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 59Growth 70Conversion 30Competition 80Returns 96Price range 50Avg price 47Brand share 83Review moat 67Quality gap 53

Returns

Incredible0.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great52%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great35%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Growth

Good+52.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Good805.1

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good€475K

€475K/yr · 1.7M searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good€4.36–€25.49

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay€11.60

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Okay2.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (35% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 falling

Sellers

105

Top-5 brand share

52%

Open market

43%

  • Lechuza18%
  • Prosperplast12%
  • Plastia10%
  • Greemotion7%
  • Generisch6%
  • GUKJOB5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€19K8%€38K12%€57K16%€76K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 50 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +52.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
70K50KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Top Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt14%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit9%

“Handhabung super easy”

Gesamtgröße8%

“Passt”

Design insgesamt7%

“Super durchdachtes Design”

Stärke6%

“2 robuste Gießkannen”

Sprühen/Durchfluss5%

“Herrliche Gießkanne”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Empfehlungs wert Preis ok”

Farbe4%

“Sehr hübsch”

Griff2%

“liegt dabei super in der Hand – auch wenn sie ganz voll ist.”

What buyers complain about

Auslaufsicher25%

“Undicht”

Gesamtgröße13%

“Plastia Gießkanne klein”

Qualität insgesamt8%

“bin etwas enttäuscht von der Qualität.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Selbst 5€ wären noch zu teuer”

Rost/Korrodieren5%

“Rost”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Daher tropt das Wasser heraus”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Foto hat mit Produkt nicht zu tun”

Haltbarkeit4%

“nicht sehr haltbar”

Dünn3%

“Sehr dünnes Material”

Materialqualität2%

“Ist halt Plastik wie bei den anderen auch”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße46%
Auslaufsicher14%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Materialqualität5%
Kratzfestigkeit4%
Farbe4%
Defekt Material/Teile4%
Wasserbeständigkeit3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%
Funktionalität insgesamt2%