Skip to content
55

gaskocher 2-flammig

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($56.23 avg), but weak search conversion (0.9%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 41Growth 14Conversion 12Competition 59Returns 90Price range 73Avg price 91Brand share 77Review moat 85Quality gap 80

Avg price

Great€56.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great304.27

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Great58%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Price range

Good€22.22–€129.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay€211K

€211K/yr · 398K searches

Growth

Bad-21.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

26 rising

Sellers

72

Top-5 brand share

58%

Open market

36%

  • Campingaz20%
  • Enders14%
  • CFH10%
  • EVOCAMP7%
  • BRUNNER7%
  • CADAC6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€8K8%€17K12%€25K16%€34K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -21.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt28%

“Super Produkt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt11%

“Macht was er soll”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit10%

“Sehr praktisch, leicht zu handhaben”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Solides Produkt zu einem vernünftigen Preis”

Stärke6%

“Robust”

Montage/Installation3%

“Sehr gut und einfach zu installieren und nutzen”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“Leicht zu reinigen”

Effizienz2%

“Als Überbrückung bis zur neuen Küche funktioniert es einwandfrei”

Design insgesamt2%

“schönes Design”

Konnektivität – insgesamt2%

“Leicht und schnell anzuschließen”

What buyers complain about

Gesamtgröße11%

“Ist Wertig bisschen klein”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Der kostet noch einmal 20€”

Qualität insgesamt9%

“Enttäuschende Qualität – Lack bereits nach zweimaligem Gebrauch ab”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt7%

“Hier sind also die Fotos irreführend”

Entflammbar7%

“Flammen”

Materialqualität5%

“Das Material ist recht dünn”

Montage/Installation5%

“Montageanleitung Verbesserungswürdig”

Stärke5%

“Material ist relativ schwach ausgeführt”

Auslaufsicher4%

“Verliert Gas”

Rost/Korrodieren4%

“Hoffe es rostet nicht”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße34%
Funktionalität insgesamt11%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Defekt Material/Teile6%
Entflammbar5%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt4%
Gewicht schwer2%
Auslaufsicher2%
Heizung2%