Skip to content
63

gaskocher

Worth a look

Shows a $2.6M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 95Growth 5Conversion 24Competition 79Returns 93Price range 74Avg price 95Brand share 67Review moat 63Quality gap 58

Market size

Incredible€2.6M

€2.6M/yr · 3.8M searches

Avg price

Incredible€35.48

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great36%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good€16.59–€129.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good994.47

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Bad1.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-40.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (36% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

25 falling

Sellers

112

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

31%

  • Campingaz37%
  • Magnum9%
  • Camplora8%
  • EVOCAMP5%
  • STAHLMANN5%
  • CFH4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€103K8%€207K12%€310K16%€414K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 38 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -40.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
450K350KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt22%

“Top Produkt”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit15%

“Alles bestens, einfache Handhabung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Solides Produkt zu einem vernünftigen Preis”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt8%

“tut was er soll”

Portabilität5%

“Perfekt - Portable - klein - super easy zu bedienen - starter mit eingebaut”

Stärke4%

“SOLIDE”

Kompaktheit4%

“Durch das kompakte Design lässt sich alles bequem transportieren und platzsparend verstauen”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt super”

Effizienz3%

“Super Campingplatz,funktioniert wunderbar”

Heizung3%

“Schnell warmes Essen”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Einfach Müll”

Gesamtgröße9%

“ist mini klein”

Haltbarkeit8%

“Schnell defekt und Tisch angeschmort”

Funktionalität insgesamt6%

“Funktioniert nicht”

Auslaufsicher5%

“Verliert Gas”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis5%

“Der kostet noch einmal 20€”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hier sind also die Fotos irreführend”

Materialqualität4%

“Dünnes Material”

Stärke3%

“Wackelig und billg”

Entflammbar3%

“Flammen”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße31%
Funktionalität insgesamt18%
Defekt Material/Teile7%
Qualität insgesamt7%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%
Entflammbar4%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Kompatibilität – insgesamt2%
Auslaufsicher2%
Heizung2%