Skip to content
65

gartentisch rund

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 27Growth 84Conversion 4Competition 95Returns 96Price range 14Avg price 76Brand share 93Review moat 83Quality gap 63

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Incredible19%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great42%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Growth

Great+83.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Great336.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Great€97.98

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay€111K

€111K/yr · 335K searches

Price range

Bad€17.91–€600.97

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (19% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

45 falling

Sellers

78

Top-5 brand share

42%

Open market

54%

  • PHI VILLA12%
  • Beautissu10%
  • DEGAMO9%
  • SIEGER6%
  • Hawthyhome5%
  • Yaheetech4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€2K4%€4K6%€7K8%€9K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 103 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +83.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 11.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation21%

“Leichte Montage,”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Super Produkt”

Stärke14%

“Robust”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis8%

“Preis/Leistung super”

Gesamtgröße8%

“alles gepasst”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Beistelltisch”

Design insgesamt6%

“Design”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Leicht klappbar”

Wetterfest2%

“Der Tisch wird als wetterfest verkauft”

Einfache Reinigung2%

“lässt sich zügig mit einem feuchten Lappen reinigen.”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Gruselige Qualität”

Montage/Installation10%

“Zusammenbau gestaltete sich problematisch”

Rost/Korrodieren6%

“manche Teile sind sogar verrostet”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt5%

“Falsch angegeben”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität4%

“Wackeliger Tisch”

Stärke4%

“da das Material eher dünn ist”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis3%

“Ungünstig”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Farbe passt also nicht”

Kratzfestigkeit3%

“Zerkratzt komplett”

Wasserbeständigkeit2%

“Tisch ist nicht wasserfest”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße35%
Farbe10%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Kratzfestigkeit7%
Höhe5%
Mechanismus probleme4%
Gleichgewicht/Stabilität4%
Qualität insgesamt4%
Montage/Installation3%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%