Skip to content
65

gartentisch 80x80

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 9Growth 89Conversion 8Competition 92Returns 99Price range 35Avg price 84Brand share 93Review moat 90Quality gap 63

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great42%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great23%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great201.58

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Great+96.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€75.07

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay€25.30–€239.70

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad€34K

€34K/yr · 73K searches

Conversion

Bad0.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (23% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

42 falling

Sellers

76

Top-5 brand share

42%

Open market

52%

  • tectake11%
  • DEGAMO9%
  • Outsunny8%
  • Relaxdays7%
  • Spetebo7%
  • LIFERUN6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€6834%€1K6%€2K8%€3K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 99 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +96.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KBlack Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt21%

“Super Produkt”

Stärke19%

“Super stabil”

Montage/Installation15%

“leichte Montage”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis/Leistung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Produkt wie beschrieben”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Super Größe”

Design insgesamt4%

“Modernes Design, einfache Montage – sehr zufrieden und klare Kaufempfehlung”

Holzqualität3%

“Sehr schönes massives Holz”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Good praktisch”

Geeignet für den Innenbereich2%

“Ideal für Balkon”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Leider keine gute Produktqualität”

Geruch13%

“Stinkt fürchterlich”

Montage/Installation11%

“Die montage dauerte ca.1 Std.-bin aber auch nicht der Homeworker-ansonsten schön”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Super kleiner Tisch”

Stärke5%

“aber krumm und instabil.”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität5%

“Sehr unstabiler Tisch”

Holzqualität4%

“Holz ist rau, sodass man Splitter bekommen kann”

Montage3%

“Halterung an Tischplatte ausgebrochen”

Design insgesamt3%

“Oberfläche unschön verarbeitet”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Die gelieferte Platte hatte das falsche Dekor, ämlich als alte Werbekisten (natürlich als Plastikfurnier). Bestellt”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße37%
Defekt Material/Teile13%
Farbe6%
Qualität insgesamt5%
Holzqualität5%
Höhe5%
Geruch4%
Kratzfestigkeit3%
Gleichgewicht/Stabilität3%
Montage/Installation3%