Skip to content
72

gartentisch

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 72Growth 85Conversion 4Competition 95Returns 98Price range 13Avg price 75Brand share 94Review moat 72Quality gap 67

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Incredible18%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great42%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Growth

Great+83.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great€98.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good€792K

€792K/yr · 2.4M searches

Review moat

Good635.87

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Bad€13.65–€680.65

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (18% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

51 falling

Sellers

80

Top-5 brand share

42%

Open market

54%

  • Casaria11%
  • DEGAMO10%
  • KESSER9%
  • Juskys6%
  • LIFERUN5%
  • tectake5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€16K4%€32K6%€48K8%€63K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 134 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +83.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 12.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Stärke18%

“Auch die Materialien machen einen robusten Eindruck”

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Super Produkt”

Montage/Installation16%

“Sehr robust leicht zu montieren”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis Leistung ok”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Hält, was er verspricht”

Design insgesamt5%

“Design”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Super Größe”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“Einfache Handhabung”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität2%

“Stabilität”

Holzqualität2%

“Sehr schönes massives Holz”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt15%

“Müll”

Montage/Installation7%

“Zusammenbau gestaltete sich problematisch”

Stärke6%

“Allerdings wackelt er”

Geruch6%

“STINKT FÜRCHTERLICH”

Gesamtgröße6%

“Super kleiner Tisch”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Hält nicht was es verspricht”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preis Leistung ok. Preis etwas zu hoch, Tisch könnte breiter sein, steht stabil, einfach im Auf/ Abbau, Gewicht ok”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität3%

“Allerdings wackelt er”

Holzqualität3%

“Billig Holz schlecht verarbeitet”

Rost/Korrodieren2%

“schon rostet er”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße33%
Defekt Material/Teile14%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Kratzfestigkeit6%
Farbe5%
Gleichgewicht/Stabilität4%
Höhe3%
Gewicht schwer3%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Montage/Installation3%