Skip to content
58

gartenschere

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 95Growth 20Conversion 81Competition 51Returns 97Price range 77Avg price 79Brand share 30Review moat 31Quality gap 32

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible€2.6M

€2.6M/yr · 1.9M searches

Conversion

Great8.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great€16.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great€5.59–€46.30

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,447.48

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-9.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

271

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

9%

  • Gardena48%
  • Fiskars24%
  • VOTREK6%
  • GRÜNTEK5%
  • SOLODOTO4%
  • FELCO4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 9%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€103K8%€205K12%€308K16%€411K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt27%

“Super Produkt”

Schneiden/Trimmen23%

“Sehr guter cut und gute Qualität”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis -Leistung ok”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit8%

“Einfache Handhabung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“Hält was sie verspricht”

Griff6%

“praktisch wäre für kleine Hände.”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Passt”

Stärke3%

“Solide”

Haltbarkeit2%

“Haltbarkeit:”

Gewicht leicht2%

“fühlt sich leicht”

What buyers complain about

Haltbarkeit23%

“Defekt nach 1. Verwendung”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Qualität ungenügend”

Schneiden/Trimmen8%

“Schnittleistung fällt im Vergleich zu SOLODOTO Profi Gartenschere deutlich ab”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis6%

“Bisschen teuer”

Griff5%

“Klemm, auch die Finger”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Zu groß für eine Frauenhand”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%

“Leider etwas unhandlich”

Rost/Korrodieren3%

“Rostet”

Stärke3%

“zu instabil”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Schade, in der Beschreibung klang alles sehr gut”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße29%
Schneiden/Trimmen12%
Defekt Material/Teile9%
Qualität insgesamt8%
Funktionalität insgesamt7%
Gewicht schwer5%
Haltbarkeit5%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Griff3%
Benutzerfreundlichkeit3%