Skip to content
53

gartenmöbel holz

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a small market ($0/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 0Growth 55Conversion 0Competition 87Returns 100Price range 2Avg price 21Brand share 72Review moat 89Quality gap 84

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great220.53

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Good+28.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Bad€362.85

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Bad€60.40–€2195.00

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad€0

€0/yr · 82K searches

Conversion

Bad0.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

34 rising

Sellers

53

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

33%

  • Casaria30%
  • Juskys10%
  • iWerk9%
  • Mega Holz7%
  • Deuba6%
  • Outsunny6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%€04%€06%€08%€01101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)8 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 77 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +28.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Qualität insgesamt23%

“Super Produkt”

Montage/Installation11%

“Aufbau easy”

Komfort insgesamt10%

“sorgen für deutlich mehr Komfort.”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis10%

“Super Preis-Leistung”

Design insgesamt6%

“Das Design ist schön und modern”

Stärke6%

“stabil und elegant”

Holzqualität3%

“Defekt an Holzstück wurde problemlos ersetzt”

Gesamtgröße3%

“Passt alles Super, bequem und schön”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt2%

“Genau was ich wollte”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit2%

“Easy Sache”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt16%

“Die Qualität hält sich in Grenzen”

Montage/Installation16%

“Zusammenbau total nervig”

Holzqualität9%

“Holzleim löst sich”

Gesamtgröße5%

“Stühle recht schmal”

Haltbarkeit5%

“Bank fällt auseinander”

Anleitung/Benutzerhandbuch/Fehlerbehebung4%

“Ohne Montageanleitung geliefert”

Ausrichtung3%

“Die vorgebohrten Löcher sind unpräzise”

Montage3%

“4. Schrauben eher minderwertig”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“Artikel kam defekt an”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis2%

“Schade bei dem Preis”

Top return reasons

Defekt Material/Teile25%
Holzqualität17%
Gesamtgröße12%
Qualität insgesamt10%
Montage/Installation4%
Montage4%
Komfort insgesamt3%
Farbe3%
Materialqualität2%
Mechanismus probleme2%