Skip to content
61

gartenbox klein

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 7Growth 96Conversion 21Competition 65Returns 97Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 46Review moat 56Quality gap 75

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+151.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Incredible€33.57

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible€23.50–€55.04

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good46%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Good1,251.2

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay77%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Bad1.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad€28K

€28K/yr · 50K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 46% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

42

Top-5 brand share

77%

Open market

16%

  • Keter27%
  • Ondis2418%
  • Koll Living13%
  • Kreher11%
  • YITAHOME8%
  • BigDean6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (9 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%€1K8%€2K12%€3K16%€4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 30 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +151.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KPrime Day '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Montage/Installation22%

“Sehr einfach zu installieren”

Qualität insgesamt14%

“Super Produkt”

Stärke10%

“Solides Produkt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis-Leistung super”

Gesamtgröße7%

“Passt”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt6%

“genau wie auf der Abbildung aus,”

Speicherkapazität5%

“Super Hocker mit dem Stauraum”

Wasserbeständigkeit5%

“Absolut wasserdicht”

Benutzerfreundlichkeit4%

“einfache Handhabung”

Materialqualität1%

“Das Material wirkt robust”

What buyers complain about

Qualität insgesamt17%

“Müll”

Montage/Installation15%

“Zusammenbau ohne Werkzeug”

Stärke8%

“Brüchiges Plastik”

Geruch6%

“Stinkt”

Materialqualität6%

“Schlechtes Material”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“Preis/Leistung ist o. k. Preis / Leistung ist o. k.”

Gesamtgröße4%

“Bei mir leider zu gross”

Defekt Material/Teile3%

“nix mit einfach klick denn Teile passen nicht”

Dicke3%

“Dünn”

Haltbarkeit3%

“Beim Aufbau ist gleich ein Stück Kunststoff beim Reinstecken raus gebrochen,die Zapfen passten auch nicht genau übereinander”

Top return reasons

Gesamtgröße34%
Defekt Material/Teile30%
Montage/Installation7%
Qualität insgesamt6%
Farbe4%
Materialqualität4%
Geruch1%
Haltbarkeit1%
Verriegelungsmechanismus1%
Mechanismus probleme1%