Skip to content
65

gartenbett

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 9Growth 97Conversion 3Competition 96Returns 98Price range 4Avg price 53Brand share 86Review moat 86Quality gap 86

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+177.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Incredible16%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Great49%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great280.06

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Good€166.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Bad€37K

€37K/yr · 97K searches

Price range

Bad€34.87–€1701.35

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad0.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (16% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

55 falling

Sellers

96

Top-5 brand share

49%

Open market

47%

  • tectake19%
  • COSTWAY11%
  • UDPATIO8%
  • Casaria7%
  • GIANTEX4%
  • Keter4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%€3712%€7423%€1K4%€1K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 163 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 52 weeks — +177.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 17.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Komfort insgesamt23%

“und am besten auch ohne Kissen einigermaßen gemütlich”

Qualität insgesamt15%

“SUPER PRODUKT”

Montage/Installation13%

“Stabil,montage easy,schnelle Lieferung”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis9%

“Preis-Leistung super”

Stärke7%

“Stabil,montage easy,schnelle Lieferung”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt4%

“Sieht aus wie auf dem Foto”

Kissen3%

“Robuste Liege”

Design insgesamt2%

“überzeugt durch ihr schönes Design”

Gleichgewicht/Stabilität1%

“Stabil”

Gesamtgröße1%

“Passt alles Super, bequem und schön”

What buyers complain about

Montage/Installation14%

“Aufbau unmöglich”

Qualität insgesamt13%

“Verarbeitungsqualität ist nicht optimal”

Haltbarkeit7%

“Nach einem Jahr defekt”

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis4%

“300 Euro sind aber total übertrieben”

Gesamtgröße4%

“nicht alles passt”

Dicke3%

“Dünnes Material”

Stärke3%

“Auflage dünn”

Rost/Korrodieren3%

“Die Rohre sind verrostet”

Materialqualität3%

“Schlechtes Material”

beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%

“Hält nicht was sie verspricht”

Top return reasons

Defekt Material/Teile18%
Gesamtgröße14%
Qualität insgesamt13%
Komfort insgesamt7%
Montage/Installation5%
Farbe5%
Materialqualität4%
beworben Vs Tatsächliches Produkt3%
Mechanismus probleme3%
Montage2%